Clements v. Phœnix Utility Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*191The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an action for damages to crops growing on bottom land of the Neosho river west of the bed of the stream, which were injured by the increased overflow flood waters of that stream, the increased depth and the current of which flood waters were caused by the grade embankment of defendant’s railroad constructed in the bottom land on the east side of the stream. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.
Defendant constructed along the bottom or low land of the Neosho river a line of railroad about two and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Conger v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Cubbins v. Mississippi River CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Union Trust Co. v. CuppySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Horn v. SeegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Clemens v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Gentry v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Jensen v. Buffalo Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.