Harris v. United States

*200KING, Associate Judge:

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial judge’s decision to revoke his probation.1 He contends that the trial judge erred by (1) relying solely on hearsay evidence that he violated conditions of his probation, (2) applying the wrong standard of proof, (3) relying upon insufficient evidence, and (4) conducting the revocation hearing while he still faced the possibility of being prosecuted for committing a new criminal offense while on probation. We affirm.

I

Pursuant to an agreement with the government, appellant entered pleas of guilty to armed manslaughter and robbery. For…