Legal Opinion
Norkin v. United States Fire Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1963No. Civ. 27189PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
Plaintiff purports to appeal from an order sustaining without leave to amend defendant’s demurrer to his second amended complaint. On November 14, 1962, a minute order was entered, stating; “Demurrer sustained without leave to amend. Counsel for moving party to prepare judgment.” No judgment has been entered.
“ It is well settled that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment. A reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type.” (Beazell v. Schrader, 205 Cal.App.2d 673 [23 Cal.Rptr. 189] ; Tellefsen v. Key…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tellefsen v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Tellefsen v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fort v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Reyna v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Fort v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982