Legal Opinion
Reyna v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1977No. Civ. 39236PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EMERSON, J. *
Paulo Reyna (hereafter appellant) joined as a plaintiff in a suit against the City and County of San Francisco, claiming damages for the wrongful death of his unborn child, a viable fetus. The general demurrer of a codefendant was sustained without leave to amend and it was stipulated that a similar ruling would be deemed to have been made with respect to the city. The order sustaining the demurrer was duly filed, but no judgment has been entered. This appeal is from “the judgment.”
No appeal lies from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. (Berri v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Randle v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Merandette v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Georgie Boy Manufacturing, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Roswall v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.