Legal Opinion

Neustrup v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1994No. A061518PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

— In this case we hold that when ordering child support the trial court lacks discretion to vary from the presumptively correct amount, calculated by applying the algebraic formula in the statute, unless one or more of the statutorily enumerated rebuttal factors is found to exist.

Garry Carter, in proprio persona, appeals from an order denying his motion to modify child support and to order spousal support. He claims the trial court failed to follow the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for child support (Civ. Code, § 4720 et seq.1), and erroneously ruled his spousal support claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. ChuidianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Chodos v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. In Re Marriage of Prietsch & CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. In Re Marriage of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Margaret Franklin-Chomas, an individual, on behalf of herself and all other individuals v. Internet Referral Services, LLC; Red Dog Media, Inc.; Ticket Fulfillment Services, L.P.; and Vivid Seats Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API