Legal Opinion

Lacks v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 1, 2005No. AC 24533PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*227 Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The petitioner, Alexander Lacks, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to prove his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, the petitioner claims that he was denied effective assistance because his trial counsel failed (1) to object to improper statements made by the prosecutor during closing arguments to the jury, (2) to explain the charges and any potential defenses to the petitioner and (3) to advise the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. PounceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Mitchell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Stevens v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Ziel v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Lacks v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API