Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 19, 2008No. AC 27957PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The petitioner, Michael Mitchell, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner contends that he is entitled to a reversal of his conviction and a new trial because of the ineffectiveness of the legal assistance he received from his trial counsel. Specifically, the petitioner claims that he was denied effective assistance because his trial counsel failed (1) to preserve sentence review rights, (2) to present a plea bargain offer to him and to inform him of the risks of trial, (3) to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Levine v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Ostolaza v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Toccaline v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Toccaline v. Lantz, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Boyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Toles v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Weinberg v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Mock v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API