Wilson, Collector v. Oklahoma Tire Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The Tax Assessor of Garland county assessed an intangible property tax against the appellees, Oklahoma Tire & Supply Company and the Kroger Grocery & Baking Company, based upon the assumed apportionment of intangible assets attributable to their operations in Garland county, Arkansas, under the supposed authority of Act 47 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1927, appearing as § 13744 of Pope’s Digest. When the Collector attempted to collect these taxes appellees filed a complaint in the Chancery Court denying ownership of any intangible property subject to taxation, and alleged that they…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Williams-Echols Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lion Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Pulaski County v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Mashburn v. Auto Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960