Legal Opinion

Mashburn v. Auto Finance Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1954No. 5-448PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McF addin, Justice.

This suit stems from an attempt to collect a tax on the capital stock of the appellee. The question here presented relates to Sec. 1 of Act 262 of 1917, which is now found in § 84-503 Ark. Stats. The appellee insists that this section was held to be unconstitutional in the case of State v. Williams-Echols D. G. Co., 176 Ark. 324, 183 Ark. 1150, 3 S. W. 2d 340. The appellant urges: (a) that the cited case decided only that Sec. 2 of the Act 262 of 1917 was unconstitutional; and (b) that we have never held Sec. 1 of the said Act 262 to be unconstitutional.

The Auto…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Williams-Echols Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lion Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Little Rock Special School District v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Williams-Echols Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Wilson, Collector v. Oklahoma Tire Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pulaski County Board of Equalization v. American Republic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Pulaski County Board of Equalization v. American Republic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API