State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lion Oil Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The Attorney General claims the right to levy and collect the tax under the provisions of §§ 9965 and 9966 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest. The act was passed by the Legislature of 1917, and among other things the title provides that it is an act assessing for taxation the tangible property of all corporations.
Section 9965 reads as follows: “All corporations doing business in this State, except corporations whose property is assessed by the Arkansas Tax Commission and the corporations required to make and file the special returns provided for in § 9904, shall,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Fargo v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Wallace v. HinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Looney, Attorney General of Texas v. Crane CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Williams-Echols Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- White River Lumber Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Bemis Bro. Bag Company v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Pulaski County Board of Equalization v. American Republic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Little Rock Special School District v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.