Legal Opinion

Obsession Sports Bar & Grill v. City of Rochester

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 20, 2017No. 17-769-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17‐769‐cv Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, et al. v. City of Rochester UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paul Natale Wendy Natale Jarrod Natale v. Town of Ridgefield Ridgefield Planning and Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Cine SK8, Inc. v. Town of HenriettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Ferran v. Town Of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Edelhertz v. City of MiddletownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API