Obsession Sports Bar & Grill v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
17‐769‐cv Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, et al. v. City of Rochester UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul Natale Wendy Natale Jarrod Natale v. Town of Ridgefield Ridgefield Planning and Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Cine SK8, Inc. v. Town of HenriettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Ferran v. Town Of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Edelhertz v. City of MiddletownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017