Legal Opinion

People v. Patronick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 2014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Koenderman, J.), dated December 10, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In establishing a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the determinations sought (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; Sex Offender…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. PettigrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. DashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. ArochoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. AlasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API