People v. Crandall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*629Correction Law § 168-n (3) requires a court making a risk level determination pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see Correction Law art 6-C) to “render an order setting forth its determinations and the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based.” The Supreme Court here failed to adequately set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law in its order. However, since the record is sufficient for this Court to make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, remittal is not required (see People v Lashway, 66 AD3d 662,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. MabeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. AbdullahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- People v. FinizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. EatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. UphaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.