People v. Arocho
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Koenderman, J.), dated November 14, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
*997Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In making a risk level determination pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]), a court must “render an order setting forth its determinations and the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HenriquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. TigreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. AlasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.