Legal Opinion

Honchell v. General Electric Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1995No. C-930667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants, Wanda Honchell and Norman Honchell, filed a complaint against General Electric Company (“GE”), defendant-appellee. Wanda Honchell claimed that she was injured when GE assigned her to a job in which it knew that injury was substantially certain to occur. Norman Honchell claimed that he suffered loss of consortium because of the injuries that his wife subsequently sustained. The trial court entered summary judgment against the Honchells, and from that judgment they appeal.

Wanda Honchell was an employee at the GE Evendale plant in Hamilton County, Ohio. As an employee, she…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dryden v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Taulbee v. Adience, Inc., Bmi Div.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API