Empire Bank v. Dumond
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CLAIRE V. EAGAN, District Judge.
Now before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 72) and Plaintiff Empire Bank’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. #76). The defendants other than Paula Tate (moving defendants) argue in their motion for partial summary judgment that they owe a deficiency to Empire Bank (Empire), that Oklahoma law governs their guaranties, that Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 686, applies to guarantors, and that they are entitled to set off the fair market value of the properties securing the obligation underlying their…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kendall v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodell v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Houston v. City of FairfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Ross Group Construction Corporation, The v. RCO Construction, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022