Legal Opinion

Houston v. City of Fairfield

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 21, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01045Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIELLE N. HOUSTON, No. 2:22-CV-01045-JAM-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 CITY OF FAIRFIELD, a public entity; City of Fairfield 15 Police Officers JOSHUA SMITH (BADGE #1730), BRENDAN BASSI 16 (BADGE #1716), DAVID REEVES (BADGE #927), GAIL HILL 17 (BADGE #1201), individually, jointly and severally; 18 Defendants. 19 20 INTRODUCTION 21 Before this Court are cross-motions for summary judgment 22 under Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The 23 parties filed…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API