Goodell v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brian Goodell, et al., No. CV-20-01657-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Van Tuyl Group LLC, 13 Defendant. 14 15 At issue is Defendant Van Tuyl Group, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23, MTD), 16 to which Plaintiffs Brian Goodell and Kerri Wolski filed a Response (Doc. 24, Resp.), and 17 Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. 31). Plaintiffs also filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. 36), to which 18 Defendant filed a Response (Doc. 37). The Court additionally considered Plaintiffs’ Notice 19 of Supplemental Authority (Doc. 38).…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Industrial Tectonics, Inc. v. Aero Alloy, a California Corporation Die Cast Products, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Metal Products GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Roberts v. CorrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.