State v. Schweppe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a jury of the crime of terroristic threats, Minn. St. 609.713, subd. 1. In this appeal from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his alternative motion for a judgment of acquittal or for a new trial, defendant principally asserts that (1) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury’s finding of guilt; (2) prejudicial error occurred when the prosecution introduced evidence of defendant’s homosexuality; (3) the prosecution failed before trial to give proper notice of his intention to use this evidence;…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. GunzelmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- United States v. Raymond S. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- United States v. Mei-Fen ChenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.