Legal Opinion

Mail Box, Inc. v. Communicators, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1985No. 13-85-058-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Appellant brought suit based on three theories of recovery: (1) unlawful, deceptive trade practices under TEXAS BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. § 17.50 (Vernon Supp. 1985); (2) breach of the implied warranty of merchantability; and (3) rescission of the contract due to nonconformities substantially impairing the value of the goods. Appellee brought a counterclaim for an indebtedness by appellant in the purchase of goods and services. Appellee, defendant below, moved that the Court disregard Findings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16 and 17. The trial court granted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Allen v. American National Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Eubanks v. WinnTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Woo v. Great Southwestern Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kneip v. Unitedbank-Victoria, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  2. Autohaus, Inc. v. Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Autohaus, Inc. v. Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Kneip v. Unitedbank-Victoria, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API