Autohaus, Inc. v. Aguilar

I respectfully dissent. The majority reverses the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee, Raul Aguilar, in his Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act1 (“DTPA”) action and renders judgment in favor of appellant, Autohaus, Inc., holding that there is “no evidence” to show that Autohaus represented to Aguilar that the Mercedes automobile which he leased had certain characteristics, ingredients, uses, and benefits which it did not have, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.46(b)(5) (Vernon 1987), or that the Mercedes automobile was of a particular standard, quality, or grade which it was…