Legal Opinion

State v. Froid

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 2009No. 2-08-340-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Introduction

The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence obtained during a stop by police while appellee was driving. The State contends that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are insufficient to comport with the dictates of State v. Cullen and requests that we remand this appeal for additional findings and conclusions. 195 S.W.3d 696 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). We decline this request and affirm the order of the trial court.

Background Facts

An Arlington police officer followed ap-pellee as she left a bar at about 5:30…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Mendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scheideman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Michael P. Nolan v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
  3. State v. Larry Green, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API