Scheideman v. State

LEE GABRIEL, Justice.

ABATEMENT ORDER

Following his guilty plea to the offense of driving while intoxicated (DWI), Appel*440lant Gregory Blaine Scheideman' appeals his conviction, claiming in three points that the trial court erred by denying his motions to suppress and by ignoring his timely request to file findings of facts and conclusions of law.

In his first point, Appellant asks us to abate and order the trial court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law because it did not do so after Appellant requested them. The record shows that at the end of the suppression hearing Appellant’s…