Mendez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.
In this case we resolve conflicts in our cases that have existed for over 75 years on the question of a defendant’s changing a plea of guilty to a plea of not guilty when evidence that is inconsistent with guilt is introduced in a jury trial. We hold that a defendant has a right on timely request to change the plea, but that a court has no duty to do it on the court’s own motion.
I. The Trial
It is undisputed that the appellant shot and killed the victim. He was indicted for the offense of murder. The court impaneled a jury. The prosecutor read to the jury only one paragraph of the indictment,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,085 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Grado, Michael AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Davison, Anthony RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- London v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
1,080 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.