Legal Opinion

Clizer v. Krauss

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1910No. 8365PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Carey, J., entered April 30, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract to purchase real property, prosecuted by the plain*27tiff, as assignee of the purchasers, against the owners, who are resisting the suit upon the ground that the rights of the purchasers and their assignee have been forfeited under the terms of the contract because of default in payment of installments of purchase price, as therein provided. A trial before the court resulted in a decree favorable to plaintiff, from which the defendants have appealed.

On July 17, 1907, the appellants, being the owners of the real property involved, entered into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zeimantz v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Asberry v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Pierce County v. MerrillWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bennett v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. PlestcheeffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. In Re Horse Heaven Irr. Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In Re Haukeli's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API