Legal Opinion
Robert R. Ingerton v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 11, 1961No. 6326_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order overruling the appellant’s motion under Rule 60 F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., to set aside a deficiency judgment and declare the same paid and satisfied. The original judgment entered in the federal district court in Oklahoma was for the unpaid balance on a promissory note made to the appellee, First National Bank of Tulsa, by the judgment-debtor and his wife. It foreclosed the mortgage on oil and gas properties made to secure the mortgage indebtedness and also a lien on attached property not covered by the mortgage. Pursuant to the judgment, all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Honeyman v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Security Insurance Company Of New Haven v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Davidson & Case Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Price v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Riverside National Bank v. ManolakisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.