Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Balboni

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 26, 1991No. 14162PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The appellants, Rexford Gardner, Bertha Masera, Dorothy Dowd and Wanda DiGiacomo (hereinafter plaintiffs), are the heirs at law (first cousins) of the decedent Clara Gardner. The appellee, Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Cancer Fund (hereinafter proponent), would be the primary beneficiary of Gardner’s estate if a document purporting to be her will is admitted to probate. The document, prepared apparently without advice of counsel, contains irregularities. The plaintiffs claim there was insufficient evidence that the will’s execution met statutory requirements to outweigh the negative inference…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Will on DardisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Prince v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Albright v. NorthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Andrews v. GorbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Oller v. Oller-ChiangSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Speers v. SpeersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API