Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Bordman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2018No. 17-2395PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Michael Bordman appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to sexual exploitation of a child and possession of child pornography. He argues that the district court 1 plainly erred in its factual analysis of his history of victimization and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence of 600 months' imprisonment. He also argues that the district court abused its discretion in awarding $3,000 in restitution to a child-pornography victim whose videos he possessed. Finally, he argues that the court erred in imposing two special conditions of supervised release related to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. David RothenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Jason StrubbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Anthony AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Christopher AbbateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jonathan SebertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.