Legal Opinion
United States v. David Rothenberg
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 8, 2019No. 17-12349PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
*1313 After his guilty plea to possession of child pornography, David Rothenberg appeals from the district court's restitution order requiring him to pay a total of $142,600 in restitution to nine victims depicted in the images of child pornography that he possessed. Section 2259 mandates that district courts order defendants "to pay the victim ... the full amount of the victim's losses" as determined by the court. 18 U.S.C. § 2259 . This case involves the question of how to calculate the amount of restitution a possessor of child pornography, like the defendant Rothenberg,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Stephen ChalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jason KushmaulCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Michael MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Moises Abraham SoteloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
- Amy v. CurtisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.