Legal Opinion
Soles v. City of Raleigh Civil Service Commission
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 6, 1995No. 9310SC235PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Intervenor-appellant City of Raleigh (the City) appeals a judgment of the superior court finding Raleigh Civil Service Act Rule .0504 (Rule .0504) unconstitutional in having placed upon petitioner-appellee John M. Soles (Soles) the burden of proving his termination from employment with the City was “without justifiable cause.” Based upon that determination, the trial court remanded the matter to respondent Raleigh Civil Service Commission (the Commission) for further proceedings consistent with the court’s order. The City’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court’s ruling…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Benavidez v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Vereen v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- City of Albuquerque v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Employment Security Commission v. PeaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- City of Albuquerque v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.