Legal Opinion
Benavidez v. City of Albuquerque
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1996No. 95-2117, 95-2118PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Pete Benavidez and Robert H. Smith, Jr., appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, the City of Albuquerque and its chief administrative officer, on their civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs were City of Albuquerque employees. They claim they were unreasonably subjected to urinalysis drug testing in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and that the City’s pre- and post-termination procedures denied them due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. We exercise jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Cillo v. City of Greenwood VillageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Riggins v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Koessel v. Sublette County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Hulen v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Harris v. Beneficial Oklahoma, Inc. (In Re Harris)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.