State v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of first and second degree controlled substance crimes for the sale and possession of cocaine. He argues his conviction should be reversed based on prosecutorial misconduct and the improper testimony of a witness. Appellant also seeks the suppression of evidence, arguing there was no probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Minneapolis police learned from an informant that a man named Ernest Dailey was distributing crack cocaine. The informant stated that Dailey goes to a condominium complex at One…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Revson v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- State v. KlosterboerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.