Legal Opinion

State v. McNeil

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 2003No. C0-02-542PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subds. 1(a), (g), and (h)(iii) (2000). Appellant contends that numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct caused him prejudice and denied him his right to a fair trial. The prosecution committed misconduct by failing to adequately prepare witnesses to avoid the mention of suppressed evidence, by asking a direct question eliciting suppressed testimony, by vouching for a witness’s credibility, and by making statements in closing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State v. Felix R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Finnegan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  5. State v. PatzoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API