State v. McNeil
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subds. 1(a), (g), and (h)(iii) (2000). Appellant contends that numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct caused him prejudice and denied him his right to a fair trial. The prosecution committed misconduct by failing to adequately prepare witnesses to avoid the mention of suppressed evidence, by asking a direct question eliciting suppressed testimony, by vouching for a witness’s credibility, and by making statements in closing…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. Felix R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Finnegan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. PatzoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.