Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Burdi

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2016No. Docket 322041PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a Macomb Circuit Court order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition. The court concluded that the statements made by defendant Burdi 1 were privileged, that the statements could not be the basis of plaintiffs claims, and that therefore, plaintiff failed to state a claim that was actionable. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs claims of abuse of process and defamation arose from an underlying property dispute being litigated in the Macomb Circuit Court before Judge Jennifer Faunce (notably, the same judge who…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Rouch v. Enquirer & NewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Smith v. StolbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Spear v. PendillMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hydrogen Master Rights, Ltd. v. WestonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  2. TM v. MZMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. 2 Crooked Creek LLC v. Jim L FryeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Beckman Holdings Inc v. Sunnyside Resort Condominium Assn IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Brian Palmer v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API