Legal Opinion
TM v. MZ
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 23, 2018No. 329190PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiordan, P.J.
*229This case returns to us on remand from our Supreme Court. When we originally heard this *230case, we dismissed the appeal for mootness. TM v MZ ,1 unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued January 19, 2017 (Docket No. 329190). The Supreme Court reversed, reasoning that "the mere fact that the instant [personal protection order (PPO) ] expired during the pendency of this appeal does not render this appeal moot," and remanded the case to us "for consideration on the merits." T.M. v. M.Z. , 501 Mich. 312, 320, 916 N.W.2d 473 (2018). Because the amended PPO was issued on the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cnn v. SebMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
- DatabaseUSA.com LLC v. The Spamhaus ProjectDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Grant Chen and Caroline Chen LLC v. Ryan SweeneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- Jh v. JphMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Lindke v. LaneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.