Legal Opinion
People v. Royal Securities Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Isidor Wasservogel, Spec. Ref.
Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from engaging in the securities business within and from the State of New York on the ground that each of them has engaged and participated in fraudulent practices, as defined in article 23-A of the Q-eneral Business Law, commonly known as- the “ Martin Act.”
The complaint sets forth 14 causes of action wherein it is alleged, in substance, that during the period from April 28,1952, to February 10,1954, defendants fraudulently offered, promoted and/or sold stock of certain corporations to the general public. The first, second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Federated Radio CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Mayo v. . KnowltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- People v. Photocolor Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. Electro Process, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- People v. Federated Radio Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Concord Fabrics, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. Cadplaz Sponsors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972
- State of New York v. Sonifer Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. EssnerNew York Supreme Court · 1984