Mayo v. . Knowlton
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of tlxe General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made June 9, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a verdict. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.
The complaint alleges two causes of action. The first allegation is, in substance, that at various times between the first day of June and the first day of September, 1882, the defendant agreed to purchase for the plaintiff, as his agent, four thousand shares of the stock of the Silver TCing Mining Company; that in pretended fulfillment of such agreement, and with the intent to deceive and defraud the plaintiff, the defendant caused to be transferred to the plaintiff the stock of the company belonging to himself, and received and retained to his own use the money paid therefor; that in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cobb v. . HatfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Burrall v. . Bushwick Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Horton v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Nourse v. PrimeNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- McNulty v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- English v. HanfordNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Schultz v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Johnson v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.