Legal Opinion
People v. Photocolor Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.
This action was instituted on behalf of the People of the State of New York by the Attorney-General pursuant to *48tlie„_authority of article 23-A of the General Business Law, commonly known and hereinafter referred to as the Martin Act. ' The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief against the defendants herein, prohibiting them from selling securities in the State of New York, and the appointment of a permanent receiver for the defendant corporations. From the facts educed at the trial it appears that defendants Photocolor Corporation, Photocolor Pictures, Incorporated, Frank E. Nemee and Arthur…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People v. Federated Radio CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Bowerman v. HamnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GenovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Bankers Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1971
- People v. Ludwig Baumann & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. Royal Securities Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Feutz v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.