Legal Opinion

People v. Federated Radio Corporation

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1926PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

On motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the appellants, the Special Term denied the motion and the Appellate Division affirmed and certified the following questions to this court:

“ (1) Does the definition of fraudulent practices contained in section 352 of article 23-A of the General Business Law of New York, known as the Martin Act, include the sale or sales of securities or commodities by means of concealment or misrepresentation of material facts, where such concealment or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Bloomquist v. . FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Charles Hughes & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. People v. Bestline Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. Lexington Sixty-First AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API