Legal Opinion

Hastreiter v. Karau Buildings, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1973No. 302PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The “order” appealed from construed the indemnification clause in the lease as requiring the tenant to hold the landlord harmless from an action by one of the tenant’s employees against, the landlord for injuries sustained as a result of a fall down stairs of the leased premises which did not have handrails.

The first question is whether' the “order” is appeal-able. The first sentence of sec. 270.54, Stats., provides as follows:

“Judgment may be given for or against one or more of several defendants or in favor of one or more of several plaintiffs, and it may determine the ultimate rights of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herchelroth v. MaharWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. McNally v. GoodenoughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sheehan v. 535 North Water StreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. PlevaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Koenings v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cintas Corp. No. 2 v. Becker Property Services LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Spivey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hammel v. Ziegler Financing Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API