Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. 535 North Water Street

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

It is conceded that the building in question is a public building within the meaning of ch. 101, Stats. By sec. 101.01 (11), Stats., the term “safe” or “safety” as applied to a public building means such freedom from danger to the safety or welfare of frequenters (among others) as the nature of the building will reasonably permit. Sec. 101.06 states that every owner of a public building shall so construct, repair, or maintain it as to render the same safe. We have held that an owner who has divested himself of possession and control by land contract or lease so that he has no right of entry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pettric v. Gridley Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kaczmarski v. F. Rosenberg Elevator Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Williams v. International Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Freimann v. CummingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. C & H Transportation Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hastreiter v. Karau Buildings, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Horvath v. BurtNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Horvath v. BurtNevada Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API