Legal Opinion

Hammel v. Ziegler Financing Corp.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 22, 1983No. 82-1216PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Ziegler Financing Corporation appeals from a summary judgment granted to Richard Hammel. The trial court ruled that Ziegler had charged usurious interest rates to Hammel from March 1980 to March 1981; the rate charged on a mortgage note executed by Hammel to Ziegler sometimes exceeded twelve percent during this period. Ziegler contends that the trial court erred in concluding that Wisconsin usury law, and not Missouri statutes, controlled the contractual relationship of the parties. The choice of law is relevant because Missouri law clearly permits rates greater than twelve percent. 1 We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Boat Town USA v. MERCURY MARINE DIVDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. C. A. May Marine Supply Company v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. First Wis. Nat. Bank of Madison v. NicholaouWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wisconsin Trust Co. v. CousinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sybron Transition Corporation v. Security Insurance Company Of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. David FriedlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Waukesha Concrete Products Co. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Wurst v. Blue River BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lovett v. Mt. Senario College, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API