Legal Opinion

Obert v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1945No. 30154, 30155 and 30156PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The principles announced in the cases of State, ex rel.Foster, v. Miller et al., Tax Comm., 136 Ohio St. 295,25 N.E.2d 686, and State, ex rel. Foster, v. Evatt, Tax Commr.,ante, 65, 56 N.E.2d 265, are inapplicable here (except paragraph 5 of the syllabus of the latter case) for the reason that the instant cases involve receipts from sales since January 12, 1937, and are to be governed by Sections 5546-12a and 5546-12b, General Code, 116 Ohio Laws, pt. 2, 333 and 334, effective January 1, 1937, and amendments to Section 5546-9a, General Code, 116 Ohio Laws, pt. 2, 329, effective January 1,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Foster v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Howard Pore, Inc. v. State Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Russo v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Merchants Cold Storage Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Walgreen Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Jones v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API