Legal Opinion

People v. Bergen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1994No. 91CA1629PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

Defendant, Wendy Anne Bergen, appeals from the judgments of conviction entered upon jury verdicts finding her guilty of dog-fighting, conspiracy to commit dogfighting, and accessory to dogfighting. We affirm.

Defendant was an investigative reporter with the news department of a Denver television station. In 1989, Denver passed an ordinance disallowing ownership of pitbull terriers, known as “pitbulls,” a breed commonly used as fighting dogs. Shortly after the ordinance was enacted, defendant began work on a feature story concerning dogfight-ing in Colorado.

The evidence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. EdebohlsColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. MerchantColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Klein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API