State v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
Defendant, Mason Arnold, appeals from a conviction of participating as a spectator at an exhibition featuring dog fighting. Among his three assignments of error, defendant argues the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutional.
*672The State’s evidence tended to show the following: On 20 February 2000, Steven Holbrook (Holbrook), a deputy with the Greene County Sheriffs Department, received a report of a dogfight in progress. Holbrook drove to the site of the alleged dogfight, an old, two-story barn on Lilly Pad Road. After he exited his vehicle, Holbrook heard “yelping…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- City of Asheville v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. WhiteleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.