Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2001No. COA00-1514PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

Defendant, Mason Arnold, appeals from a conviction of participating as a spectator at an exhibition featuring dog fighting. Among his three assignments of error, defendant argues the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutional.

*672The State’s evidence tended to show the following: On 20 February 2000, Steven Holbrook (Holbrook), a deputy with the Greene County Sheriffs Department, received a report of a dogfight in progress. Holbrook drove to the site of the alleged dogfight, an old, two-story barn on Lilly Pad Road. After he exited his vehicle, Holbrook heard “yelping…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. City of Asheville v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. WhiteleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API