Legal Opinion

Achter v. Maw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1972No. 12317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs initiated this action to resolve a boundary dispute. The trial court rendered judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal therefrom.

Defendants, pursuant to negotiations with LeR Burton, who represented LeR, a Utah corporation, purchased a tract of land in Davis County, which was conveyed by warranty deed and recorded on June 1, 1965. On July 7, 1965, defendants employed licensed surveyor, Dahl, to survey on the ground the description contained in their deed. Dahl placed stakes in the ground at all points where the description changed direction.

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Scott v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  3. LOSEE Et Ux. v. JONES Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. JOHNSON REAL ESTATE COMPANY v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Chevron Oil Company v. Beaver CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc. v. Travelers Leasing Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Weaver v. StaffordIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ash v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Clark v. SmayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. Mahas v. RindlisbacherUtah Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API