Clark v. Smay
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 This case involves a dispute over a strip of land located in Salt Lake County. The trial court ultimately quieted title to the disputed property in Appellee, concluding that a survey based on the metes and bounds description of a deed controlled over the depiction of a natural monument on a subdivision plat map. We affirm.
BACKGROUND 1
¶ 2 In August of 1909, the Leinket family was deeded a large parcel of land bordering on the Maple City subdivision located in Emigration Canyon in Salt Lake County. The deed described the boundaries of the land by metes and bounds. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Park v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Williams v. OldroydUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Gillmor v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- JOHNSON REAL ESTATE COMPANY v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Otteman v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007