Legal Opinion
Mobile Discount Corp. v. Schumacher
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 1, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4702PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 Ariz. 15 (1983)
676 P.2d 649
MOBILE DISCOUNT CORPORATION, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Harold SCHUMACHER and Deborah Schumacher, Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
No. 2 CA-CIV 4702.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.
November 1, 1983.
Review Denied January 24, 1984.
Rees & McNeill by David W. Rees, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant/cross-appellee.
James F. Crane, Tucson, for defendants/appellees/cross-appellants.
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
In 1972 the Schumachers entered into a retail installment contract with Livin' Easy Mobile Sales, Inc. for the purchase…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Pierpont v. Hydro Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Leon v. ByusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Mobile Discount Corp. v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Focal Point, Inc. v. U-Haul Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Poling v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cauble v. OsselaerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Hull v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Burroughs v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.