Legal Opinion
Poling v. Morgan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1987No. 85-2711PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
This action arises from the sale of a mobile home, a subsequent default, and the eventual repossession and sale of the home. The district court granted partial summary judgment and entered a judgment on a jury’s verdict in favor of defendants. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
*884FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Orris and Ruth Poling (the Polings) purchased a mobile home from Jackson’s Mobile Homes (Jackson’s) in 1973. Jackson took a security interest in the mobile home which it immediately assigned to Mobile Discount Corporation (Mobile Discount), one of several…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gabrielson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-EscarsegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ronald R. RewaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- City and County of San Francisco v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Cabo Distributing Co., Inc. v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Bolbol v. City of Daly CityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.