Legal Opinion

Mobile Discount Corp. v. Schumacher

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 1, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4702PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

In 1972 the Schumachers entered into a retail installment contract with Livin’ Easy Mobile Sales, Inc. for the purchase of a mobile home. The contract was assigned to Mobile Discount Corporation, which in turn assigned its interest to the Mission Bank. In assigning the contract, Mobile Discount agreed to act as guarantor for the Schumacher’s obligation.

In June 1973 the Schumachers decided they could no longer make the payments on the mobile home. Mr. Schumacher contacted the manager at Livin’ Easy who, according to Schumacher’s testimony, told him there would be no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Pierpont v. Hydro Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Leon v. ByusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mobile Discount Corp. v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API