Mobile Discount Corp. v. Schumacher
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
In 1972 the Schumachers entered into a retail installment contract with Livin’ Easy Mobile Sales, Inc. for the purchase of a mobile home. The contract was assigned to Mobile Discount Corporation, which in turn assigned its interest to the Mission Bank. In assigning the contract, Mobile Discount agreed to act as guarantor for the Schumacher’s obligation.
In June 1973 the Schumachers decided they could no longer make the payments on the mobile home. Mr. Schumacher contacted the manager at Livin’ Easy who, according to Schumacher’s testimony, told him there would be no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Pierpont v. Hydro Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Leon v. ByusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mobile Discount Corp. v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983